The Galor is probably designed for a size ofĤ81m, and this is mainly consistent with the VFX. The Olympic should be about the same size, as can be deduced from its deck structure. Of at most 260m instead of the correct length of approximately 310m. Nacelles of the depicted side view are too small, resulting in a size The explanation for the Constellation is simple because the To additional errors so that they don't fit in the order of size. Namely the Constellation, Olympic and Galor, seem to be subject Reliable reference for the lengths of the less prominent ships in Taking this into account, the Encyclopedia is no Overall errors of up to 15% even for the ships whose sizes are Depending on the chosen reference, there are Ships, but the relative sizes of the remaining vessels are not consistent either. Galaxy and the Vor'cha are too small in relation to the other II are merely ordered by size, while the scale varies, so no clear-cut lengths can be derived from them. The ships in the two charts in the Encyclopedia Probert, **** told by David Stipes in a separate newsgroup post Sources (partially converted to metric system and rounded), *įrom ILM size chart for ST:TSFS, ** from charts or preferablyĮntries in the Encyclopedia I, *** provided by Andrew

Size figures to 'real' starship lengths, based onĬonstitution II, Sovereign, Galaxy: Reference ships, the column below shows theĪccording hypothetical sizes of the other ships (factor * length in Encyclopediaįigures from the E II figures given in the columnĭavid Stipes in his newsgroup post (converted to metric system) The Galaxy' charts in the Star Trek Encyclopedia IIįactor: Conversion factor of Encyclopedia II Starships & Ships of Earth Registry' and 'Ships of Accepted: Commonly accepted size figure (confirmed byĭesigner and consistent in previous publications)Į II: Measured lengths in the 'Federation

Starbound ship size comparison